I can't decipher this. I am an American so I don't have any strong views on any of these countries at all.
Like other contributors to the Forum, I feel that the question lacks precision and gives me nothing I can answer. Israel: The UN resolution of 1948 enabled the foundation of the Nation-State (a secular democracy). There seems little point in me being OK or otherwise with this. Lebanon: Like other parts of the region it has been part of several empires and arrangements. Its current structure largely represents a decision made at the end of the Ottoman Empire and its independence came at the end of WW2 when France allowed its independence. What is there for me to be OK about or not here? Syria: Syria is largely unresolved for a number of reasons. The current regime is less than ideal and has been responsible for some barbarism of it own citizens. There are a number of challenges to the current regime from Rebels and from ISIS. The regime survives in part due to Russian determination to secure the safety of its naval base at Tartus, leased from the current regime and house a significant part of its nuclear naval capability. This is for Russia the warm water sea port they were denied by the partition of India and Pakistan. Westbank: The Westbank of the Jordan River is Palestinian Territory as best we can tell from the poorly framed UN Resolution 242 which was supposed to settle these matters and clearly hasn't. Israeli settlements in the West Bank have been a source of constant irritation, and an ongoing failure by Israel to hold any respect for the Palestinian People, also children of Abraham. At one stage Jordan probably wanted it, which may be part of why they were the only Arab Nation onside with the establishment of Israel, but things didn't go to plan, and so now they probably don;t want it either. Gaza: Gaza most clearly aligns with the ancient lands of the Philistines and should probably not be part of Israel, and has been more or less treated with the West Bank. Egypt once wanted it, and probably now does not want it. Jordan: Jordan has its own history, and is associated with the British a Mandated Territory and granted independence in 1946. It is home to a couple of million Palestinian refugees, most of who have been granted Jordanian citizenship. From 1970 to 2020 the population has moved from 1 Million to 10 Million, partly due to migration from Israel, The West Bank, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon during various conflicts. One must assume the nation has many challenges. Egypt: Egypt was an English protectorate from 1914 to 1922 when it gained its independence. It is the one nation on the list that is only partially in the Lavant, however mainly an African Nation, though they speak Arabic (possibly Egyptian Arabic). The people of all these nations are Semitic people and they all speak semitec languages. Of course, you have made no mention of Jerusalem which is perhaps one of the most problematic pieces of real estate on the planet, and important to all three of the Abrahamic Faith Traditions. I am but a wandering and wondering outsider. I have no business being OK or not OK with any of these countries. I am NOT OK with unreasonable violence the destruction of lives and heritage by Jews, Muslims, Christians, or anyone else who thinks it is OK not to recognise the hand of God in the creation of each and every person.
I am an American. What happens there does not truly effect me in depth, ergo I do not have in depth views on every political matter over there. There are 50 states and over 300 million people in my own country. My own state has over 30 million people. To be a faithful citizen, it behooves me to care for the issues that are most local to me. However it is simply inappropriate to develop these deeply held emotional political beliefs to people and places I have no real connection to. For the record, my focus in school was on the history & politics of the Middle East, including taking Arabic. Very fascinating place, but not one where I emotionally root for some countries against others.
What on earth are you talking about? thanks to 9/11, my country was embarked on two major wars and a huge focus on terrorism that changed American life on many different levels. This entire thread is truly strange and I still am not sure what the point of the question is. But the idea that American citizens' lives were not affected by the terrorist attacks on 9/11 is ignorant in the extreme.