The lesson of Anglicanism: liberalism will tear you apart The ordination of the first 32 female priests in the Church of England, in Bristol Cathedral on 12 March 1994 (Getty) Highly political synods shattered Anglicanism's fragile unity. Catholics should take note A former Anglican Chaplain to the Queen, the Revd Gavin Ashenden, is spearheading a revolt in the Church of England Synod over the thorny issue of homosexuality. Anglicans are talking openly about schism. Catholics the world over should be watching very carefully. Anglicanism’s real problem has always been a theological schizophrenia – the result, perhaps, of it having formed to appease a lusty monarch rather than to preach a creed with clarity. Ask a hundred Anglicans what Anglicanism actually is and expect a hundred answers. The Church of England isn’t, really, one Church at all. It’s an Erastian umbrella organisation holding together, by virtue of the Crown, a smorgasbord of competing theologies. For most of the 20th Century this diversity was even viewed as its strength because, thanks to a shared pension board and the clever use of ambiguity in official statements, the three main factions with Anglicanism – which one wag labelled ‘high and crazy’, ‘broad and hazy’ and ‘low and lazy’ – were happy enough to rub along together despite their radically different set of beliefs. It seemed as if the Nicene Creed, a very loose application of the 39 articles and strong civic approval gave just enough common ground to hold the show together. Two major developments in the 20th Century brought this uneasy truce into question. The first was the adoption of synodical governance which led to a radical politicisation of the Church of England. With everything suddenly up for grabs, by virtue of majority vote, the factions no longer pulled together in unity but began to plot and lobby against each other. General Synod became a battleground on which theological opponents could be put to the sword. And it didn’t take long for the liberal lobby, strengthened by trends in society and over-represented on the bench of bishops, to realise synod worked in their favour. Did the Holy Spirit said no to women priests in July’s Synod? Fret not: table the motion again in February, then repeat ad nauseum, until the Holy Spirit finally gets the message! That is how democratising the deposit of faith tends to work, though the system admittedly tends to favour Barabbas over Jesus. The second development which disrupted Anglican unity occurred when the Book of Common Prayer became optional not mandatory. You are what you pray: lex orandi, lex credendi. With the shackles removed, parishes started to go their own way. Today, there is almost no common ground between an evangelical parish on one side of town and its liberal counterpart on the other. This represents a massive problem for the Church of England: how can you bring people together in love when there is zero shared praxis between them? The situation has become so grave that the Lambeth Conference can no longer be held, due to deep divisions even at the level of the episcopacy. Throw into this toxic mix the effects of the sexual revolution, and the strong secular ideology of the present culture with its LGBTQ crusade, and the writing seems to be on the wall. Historically the Church of England kept to a via media, teetering between Catholic and Protestant claims. But neither of these is destined to win out. Instead the body will fall between the gaps. Its Catholic claim (and ecclesiology) ended with the defeat of Anglo-Catholicism over the issue of women priests; its authentic Protestant claim ended via an inevitable creeping embrace of “gay marriage” and notions of gender fluidity. Click here for the rest of the article: http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/com...f-anglicanism-liberalism-will-tear-you-apart/
Like is hardly adequate. I have not been secret in my dismay that it seems that we have lost a lot of our tolerance of each other in exchange for a tolerance of things that sever the bonds of unity. We have been inclined to work for the strength of our part of Anglicanism rather than for the strength of Anglicanism. Psalm 122:6 O pray for the peace of Jerusalem : may those who love you prosper.
Philip, you talk of people working for their part of Anglicanism rather than Anglicanism as a whole. Is it possible that people don't know what Anglicanism is any more and some who purport to be Anglican bare little resemblance to traditional Anglicanism?