John Wesley

Discussion in 'Church History' started by PotterMcKinney, Apr 17, 2017.

  1. PotterMcKinney

    PotterMcKinney Active Member Typist Anglican

    Posts:
    314
    Likes Received:
    224
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    PECUSA
    In short, how do you guys feel about the thought of John Wesley?
     
  2. anglican74

    anglican74 Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    1,343
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican (ACNA)
    I dunno, I think he was a great man, with a lot of promise and amazing abilities, who was led into schism and heresy. It's kind of sad, really...
     
    PotterMcKinney likes this.
  3. Shane R

    Shane R Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,178
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican
    He was the pioneer of most of the modern charismatic groups. To some degree he must be held accountable for that legacy, but I think he would be appalled at what his flock became. He had just nearly as much disdain for 'enthusiasts', as they were called in those days, as Richard Hooker. I don't think he was able to see the end of what he started.

    However, he mainstreamed Arminianism, which I defend as not the enemy. Are the Articles Arminian? Not really, but they strike a very careful balance between Reformed and Lutheran positions. If Arminianism had been known at the time the Articles were drafted, it likely would have received some voice.
     
    PotterMcKinney likes this.
  4. PotterMcKinney

    PotterMcKinney Active Member Typist Anglican

    Posts:
    314
    Likes Received:
    224
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    PECUSA
    In all honesty, I have difficulty with Arminianism; it seems so intuitive, yet at the same time I only ever feel as though I'm just avoiding thoughts on the "irresistible logic", as Luther put it, of predestination by entertaining it. Perhaps I do not understand it well enough. Do any of you have any good resources aside from Wesley that could help me understand Arminianism in relation to Anglicanism?
     
  5. anglican74

    anglican74 Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    1,343
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican (ACNA)
    We affirm that both are true, right? Predestination and a free will which is preceded by prevenient grace. That is the traditional centuries-old, millenia-old unchangeable position, afaik.
     
  6. PotterMcKinney

    PotterMcKinney Active Member Typist Anglican

    Posts:
    314
    Likes Received:
    224
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    PECUSA
    I suppose I misunderstand the debate as a whole, then. I was under the impression that Anglicanism leaned towards Calvinistic positions on these things.
     
  7. anglican74

    anglican74 Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    1,343
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican (ACNA)
    I don't see any basis for it, mainly for the reason that our theologians didn't like to adopt modern emerging views as such. Thus they rejected the Arminian label but also rejected the Puritans and the Calvinists, even if both positions had pieces of something true and valuable in it.

    The reason is that both positions were novel, and named after particular thinkers, rather than going back to antiquity and having the stamp of eternity on them. That's why our formularies and liturgies never name any living author or thinker as their sources. Everything had to be rooted in antiquity, or not at all.

    That being said, the Divines quite emphatically taught free will and prevenient grace, which later became attached to the label of Arminianism. Yet at the same time they taught the concept of predestination, which later became associated with Calvinism (ignorantly). The concepts we use today did not exist in those times, and they were happy to adopt and promote the traditional understanding of grace, election, and free will, that became lost and corrupt in the 20th century.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
  8. PotterMcKinney

    PotterMcKinney Active Member Typist Anglican

    Posts:
    314
    Likes Received:
    224
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    PECUSA
    What would that understanding be? I apologize for being difficult.
     
    anglican74 likes this.
  9. anglican74

    anglican74 Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    1,343
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican (ACNA)
    That both are valid, when properly understood. God is fully sovereign and decides everything, when that is correctly understood; and that man has free will, when correctly understood.
    :)
     
    PotterMcKinney likes this.
  10. Shane R

    Shane R Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,178
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican
    Not a resource that relates Arminianism to Anglicanism, but the theologian Roger E. Olsen is a staunch Arminian. He blogs at Patheos and has written a couple of books seeking to clarify the Arminian positions. He teaches at Baylor.
     
  11. PotterMcKinney

    PotterMcKinney Active Member Typist Anglican

    Posts:
    314
    Likes Received:
    224
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    PECUSA
    I am familiar with the blog. Thanks for inspiring me to read it.